...and so on.
Give me a break.
One of the unexpected and largely unwanted by-products of the internet age is the ability to comment upon the work of others in a simplistic and anodyne fashion. Flickr and other photo sharing sites are the worst, by far, but the pernicious plague spreads far and wide to otherwise sensible corners of the web. The almost hysterical shriek of GREAT CAPTURE! leaps from the screen like a pair of fluorescent chartreuse cycle shorts on a middle-aged sumo wrestler. It's the electronic equivalent of a "high five", or chummy slap on the back, and generally has the same tea-spitting effect as the latter.
Do other pastimes have the equivalent, I wonder? Do watercolourists run around each other in circles shouting WOOT! at the sight of a well-rendered landscape? Do quilters experience orgasmic glee when confronted by a particularly, er, well-filled, one?
Now, you will probably by this point be thinking of me as a bit of a curmudgeon. Why shouldn't people be encouraging (and encouraged), I hear you say. What's wrong with a bit of heartfelt enthusiasm?
There's the rub.
What's missing for me, 99.9 times out of 100, is the little matter of "sincerity". Let's dwell on that thought for a moment. The origins of the word give us a clue as to what it is all about. It is from the Latin, "sin cere", meaning "without wax". I understand (I wasn't there...) that an unscrupulous sculptor back in the days of the Roman Empire might use an inferior quality of marble, or cover up careless chisel marks, by using wax as a filler. This worked well as a cunning ruse to fool the unwary art lover right up to the point that their newly acquired household god, tasteful nude or priapic faun was hit by the warming rays of the sun as it streamed across the Aventine. The wax would melt, leaving our hapless purchaser with something that looked like a large tabby had sharpened their claws on it. The sculpture was revealed as not genuine. The real thing was "sin cere"...
A genuine comment, truly meant, is worth a thousand times more than something that has been cut'n'pasted a dozen times already in that browsing session alone. I swear that some people leave such comments like some sort of electronic paper trail, just to prove that they have been there. They are probably the same people who had "I-Spy" books as children, bought to keep them quiet on long journeys as they assiduously ticked off each type of lorry, tree, pylon or whatever. Big Chief I-Spy has heap much to answer for, I fear.
I'm not saying don't comment - but if you have nothing genuine to say, then I don't think I'm alone in saying that I'd rather you said nothing at all. If you have the time, the inclination and the mastery of your keyboard to use the q,y,i,o,s,d,f,h,j,k*,l,z,x,v,b,n and m keys in addition to those that go to make up that most empty of plaudits, please do so. The best comments are thought-provoking. They make the photographer look at their own image afresh, to see it with new eyes. The vast majority of photographers are terrible self-editors, who need all the help they can get to separate their wheat from the chaff. Thoughtless praise for mediocrity, lightly given, simply encourages more mediocrity.
Like it? Loathe it? Let me know. But DON'T say "Great capture!"
There is another dimension to this. There seems to be an almost paranoid fear of causing offense. Critical comments, especially constructive and well-composed ones, are so rare that the WWF are starting an appeal. I suspect that this is in part because it is easier to carpet-bomb with smileys than snarlys (Is that a word? It deserves to be). Constructive criticism, or critique, is HARD, because it requires TIME and THOUGHT. Those are increasingly precious commodities in the modern World, where Apple and Blackberry are now communication devices instead of something that goes well with crumble and custard.
So.
Please - comment away, but do so with your mind in gear, not your rubber stamp in hand.
Bill
*I'm assuming that you are not one of those who think it's cute to spell capture with a K...
--o-O-o--
- All images on this blog are copyright Bill Palmer and may not be reproduced in any format or medium without permission.
- This Blog entry has been brought to you by the Provisional wing of the Popular Front for the Promulgation and Preservation of Constructive Criticism.
Dear Bill, I just found your blog today through the Leica Forum and have been reading it like a book - each post is more and more interesting, thought-provoking, somewhat critical but straight to the point. If I am to live up to the standard set in this particular post, it is only justified that I did not comment on any of the other posts (although I did recommend them already to several people). Your comments on the authenticity of feedback has been something I've longed to hear from others esp. with view of the popular sharing websites that you mention (Flickr in particular but also DeviantART). I'd be interested in reading more from you on your opinion of online communities in general and online forums as well. It is ironic that I found the link to this blog in the answers to one of those questions "I'll be doing XXX kind of photography; what would be the best gear for it?".
ReplyDeleteToday I wrote a short review of the book by David Pogue "The World according to Twitter" (http://imperfiction.com) and reading this post I was thinking: is there a difference between the different communities? Pogue argues that the people that contributed to his book are educated and intelligent (at the same time!), witty and funny (at the same time!), ...; and they all collectively contributed to the book - although they don't know him personally, did not really have an incentive, did not even get recognized (by their proper name, just their Twitter handle) - as such there is no other reason for contribution than simply the willingness to contribute: authenticity. And yet, this is an online community - and the endeavor of writing the book was basically a question-and-answer session. I find this particularly interesting in light of your (and mine) observations of photo comments such as "great capture exclamation mark".
I don't have the eloquence of your writing to end this comment in the swell way you do yours, so I am just signing off - continuing to read the archive of delightful observations.
Best wishes,
Konstantin, aka Imperfiction