Leaving aside the probability that:
a) The audience doesn't know a lot about the poster in terms of their tastes, skills etc.,
b) Most of said audience doesn't know anything material about the proposed holiday destination either,
c) The destination given ("Europe", "China", "South America"...) is so vague that no answer can be meaningful,
and
d) Most of said audience only ever give the same answer to any such query based upon their own tastes and preferences.
The quality and usefulness of response is going to be dubious at best and bloody useless at worst.
So why (oh why) do people persist in these ridiculous threads? There can be only one answer.
They're boasting.
Yes.
That's it. They are simply taking the opportunity for a spot of self-aggrandisement. In fact, the seemingly innocent "holiday question" is a great 2 for 1:
a) I am going somewhere special/expensive/hard to get to
b) I have lots of expensive kit
This last is a particularly modern form of hubris. In the ancient world, excessive pride was a crime. Crowing over one's peers, or indeed one's vanquished foes, was regarded as very bad form indeed, much as owning an f1 Noctilux today and openly musing as to the benefits of adding a f.0.95 Noctilux to your collection of humidity-controlled dust-gatherers is guaranteed to reduce any right-thinking fellow photographer (for which read "real photographer") to acts of mindless irritation. The "autosignature" is a particular refinement of this phoenomenon, enabling the poster to re-state their entire palette of toys with the press of a button. I do wonder at the mentality of those whose signature is both longer and more interesting than their posts, however.
The only form of this question that makes any real sense is "From your own direct experience, what is [location x] like?". Any photographer with half a brain can do their own online research these days; the likes of Flickr and Google Earth provide the opportunity to find out what others have done, and what a given location looks like. The old advice used to be to go to a newsagents on arrival and look at the postcards - now with the "global village" we can browse through others' snaps, tagged - geotagged, even - without leaving the comfort of our own armchairs.
What is invaluable is "local knowledge" - places to eat, to sit, where photography is encouraged, where it is frowned upon, where and how the scam artists operate, how to get around, where the best beer is to be found. All of the above come from personal experience. People who have been there, or even better, live there -in other words, those least likely to be impressed by your ability to travel there.
I chose the lens, body, aperture, shutter speed and destination all by myself...
I don't want or need someone to pick my kit for me. I don't want someone to oo and ah over my equipment - unless they are particularly attractive, of course - I don't need people to be impressed by my choice of destination, or by the size of my wallet. It's useful to know that the lighting in museum x is particularly low, or that the queues for art gallery y only get bad after 10AM, but telling me that I absolutely must take a wide-angle or I will miss some great shots is about as useful as a photograph of a rope to a drowning man.
No, I don't care how much you have spent on where you are going, or the money you have invested in what you might take, but if I've been there before, I'll gladly give you my opinion on the place - provided you aren't just boasting, of course...
Bill
--o-O-o--
- All images on this blog are copyright Bill Palmer and may not be reproduced in any format or medium without permission.
I also think that a flawed logic when going someplace far away is that "I must bring everything I own so that I can do anything imaginable while I'm in such a strange land." Screw that. Take the gear that you know how to use and get great results for it. Traveling to a new country isn't an excuse to buy a new $4000 lens for experimentation that results in you F-ing everything up you take. It is an opportunity to show off the skills you learned at home with the gear you already have and have mastered.
ReplyDeleteIn my experience I don't really seem to make (m)any worthwhile pictures, beyond my own memory snaps, when visiting anywhere that I'm not familiar with. My faourite pictures are of places and people that I am, at least to some extent, intimate with. This tends to take more than a single visit and needs that I spend more time talking than changing lenses.
ReplyDeleteHence, there is usually not a lot of point in me carrying lots of stuff. Pretty much like home really.
There are some valid answers to the question:
ReplyDelete* Gear that won't break if your bag gets dropped.
* Gear that won't cause a heart-attack if it gets stolen.
* Gear that won't leave you writhing in pain after 10 hours of walking.